Russell can add his bit later.
NIL question— my assumption is that the top 100-150 players in the nation will demand high $ and the fishers in that pool will be limited to a few big name programs… but after that, what strategy do you think schools (the rest of the P5) will deploy to go after the best possible 3• players? Apply a disproportionate amount of $ to get the best available at the positions of greatest need? Save most NIL$ to attract key transfers? I realize that technically the $ doesn’t come from the schools but I’m sure they will try to deploy a strategy. I think juggling this while avoiding internal issues is going th be tough.
KQ- I think once you are out of the top 50-100 kids actually it changes a lot. I think you invest if you are GT in the players you have and keeping them using NIL for the intended purpose. I think we will see some shifting away from some of the enticements as schools get overextended and over-promised to kids who don't deliver. If I think in the hypothetical if you are using it to lure a prospect it will be extremely targeted and there are some top 200 type kids who really don't care about it we've found this year. I think it will also be used for key transfers as you pointed out, but again I would think that will be guys who started elsewhere.
For the other sites yall manage or have managed in the past, do people get as upset about a new thread posting as JOL subscribers? It's like the thread police on here from JOL folks. I don't create many new threads but find it funny when people get called out for creating one when that topic was covered on page 47 of another thread.
KQ- It is a constant on any message board. I'm an aviation geek and I am a lurker on an aviation message board and the same shit happens on there all the time and people argue about whether it should be a new thread with something that is news that is buried in a 57-page thread. It is just message board stuff.
Do you have a take on Clawsons willingness to listen to offers? With the recent struggles and Hartman leaving could he be more likely to look at jumping?
KQ- I do not know, his set up is pretty good right now and they are no longer going to play Clemson and FSU every year under the new ACC scheduling model at Wake. That is big for them because those are two of the teams they struggle the most with. Wake has GT, VT and Duke. That is a smoother path. I'll ask around.
What happened to McDuffie?
KQ- He was not on the sideline that I saw at VT. He may have been one of the guys who was out with the flu though. He has been limited to special teams the last few weeks mostly. He played a handful of snaps at RB. Hassan Hall and Dontae Smith are getting the bulk of the carries. McDuffie hasn't been as productive as expected when he was getting regular carries.
Any injury report on Dylan?
KQ_ Dylan Leonard was dressed, his dad could weigh in, but I am going to guess he was either hurt or sick. I know he got banged up recently in a game. Both Leonard and Pierce Quick were dressed but didn't play. I believe Quick was an injury. Leonard may have been emergency only on Saturday. Neither Leonard nor Quick warmed up.
Any update on the Daniels situation?
KQ- It was a couple of different things that led to the decision to part ways. I don't have anything solid enough to report and honestly I like Daniels personally so I am not going to dig too deeply on that. This type of thing happens from time to time.
What is JBatt looking for in new head coach? Experienced HC? Coordinator? Possible previous relationship with someone? I know there may not be info on this. Just your gut feeling.
KQ- No idea, really there is no way to tell. I think previous relationships help at times, but there is no real lead to follow with this.
In evaluating Key for the job do you think Batt is looking at more than a particular amount of wins he gets and comparing his resume to other top targets? is he listening to boosters and seems like there may be a push from some to keep Key as HC. Or is that not happening from boosters and they want to chose the best coach?
Or would he obviously see Keys wins as impressive but still want an experienced HC and his guy?
KQ- Key and Batt have a previous relationship, I've mentioned this before so slide that part of it out of your mind. Whoever he picks is going to be "his guy" whether that is Key or some other completely random name we haven't even thought of on here yet. Again the guy has been here for like 8-9 days and has never run a coaching search. There are not many data points to draw any conclusions on what he will or won't do.
Getting to know Brent better since he’s taken over, do you think he would be more receptive to the portal as the permanent head coach than he was in 2019 with a roster starting from scratch? Or would this depend mostly on where NIL can get to before signing day and spring semester?
KQ- I think you want a mixed approach and I think Key would tell you that. The area I know he regrets taking a shortcut with was the OL but that was not his call. They took older transfers the first few years instead of younger transfers or more HS kids and they are paying for that now and a little bit last year too. I think the DL is a better example of the approach they should have where you have a lot of organic growth supplemented with a guy like Keion White.
What was your personal take on pyron based on practice and in game so far
KQ- When I watched him in practice in the fall you could see all the tools, but the game was moving too fast and he was pressing trying to be perfect and not just playing football. I think at some point the last few weeks he started to see it slow down for him and he looks like the kid I saw at Pinson Valley HS last year when I went to watch him play in a game where his team was completely overmatched and he was playing behind a terrible OL (sound familiar). He is tough and wants to win and that can carry you a long way in college just as Josh Nesbitt or Logan Thomas at VT.