... as we approach mid-March...
I used to be a little concerned with GT's relative slower start but you can't complain about Brent's results.
I see us having a good chance of finishing in the top 5 in the ACC, even higher if we can increase 2024's W total:
BC - 9 commits (2 5.7)
Cal - 3 commits (1 4-star)
Clem - 10 commits (1 6, 2 5.9, 4 5.8, 2 5.7)
Duke - 4 commits (3 5.7)
FSU - 7 commits (6 4-star, 1 5.7)
GT - 0 commits
Louis - 9 commits (2 4-star, 2 5.7)
Mia - 4 commits (2 5.9, 2 5.7)
UNC - 7 commits (1 5.7)
NCSt - 4 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
Pitt - 2 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
SMU - 4 commits (2 4-star, 1 5.7)
Stanford - 2 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
SYR - 9 commits (1 4-star, 2 5.7)
UVA - 3 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
VT - 1 commit (0 5.7 or higher)
Wake - 0 commits
*ND* - 7 commits (4 5.9, 2 5.8, 1 5.7)
I used to be a little concerned with GT's relative slower start but you can't complain about Brent's results.
I see us having a good chance of finishing in the top 5 in the ACC, even higher if we can increase 2024's W total:
BC - 9 commits (2 5.7)
Cal - 3 commits (1 4-star)
Clem - 10 commits (1 6, 2 5.9, 4 5.8, 2 5.7)
Duke - 4 commits (3 5.7)
FSU - 7 commits (6 4-star, 1 5.7)
GT - 0 commits
Louis - 9 commits (2 4-star, 2 5.7)
Mia - 4 commits (2 5.9, 2 5.7)
UNC - 7 commits (1 5.7)
NCSt - 4 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
Pitt - 2 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
SMU - 4 commits (2 4-star, 1 5.7)
Stanford - 2 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
SYR - 9 commits (1 4-star, 2 5.7)
UVA - 3 commits (0 5.7 or higher)
VT - 1 commit (0 5.7 or higher)
Wake - 0 commits
*ND* - 7 commits (4 5.9, 2 5.8, 1 5.7)
Last edited:
