Went back and dug up the 3pt numbers for ACC games. This obviously doesn't include Grambling, Wright St. and Wofford - which were all Ls and in which (I believe) we were fairly pummeled from the 3pt line in losing 3 close games.
The first 9 ACC games actually weren't as bad as I thought...
@ ND (L) GT 6-for-20, ND 7-for-20 (net -3) We went 7-for-18 from the FT line, were -8 there
vs. Miami (W) GT 1-for-10, Miami 4-for-19 (net -9) GT +9 from FT line
vs. ND (W) GT 5-for-12, ND 4-for-18 (net +3) GT -2 from FT line
@ Pitt (W) GT 3-for-15, Pitt 6-for-14 (net -9) FTs were a wash, GT was +24 on 2pt FGs
vs. UVa (L) GT 5-for-11, UVa 3-for-13 (net +6), GT was -24 on 2pt FGs
@ UNC (L) GT 5-for-18, UNC 5-for-21 (net 0), GT was -16 on FTs
@ FSU (L) GT 5-for-16, FSU 5-for-13 (net 0), GT was -16 on 2pt FGs
vs. Clemson (L) GT 5-for-11, Clemson 10-for-21 (net -15)
vs. Cuse (W) Both teams 5-for-18, GT was -8 at FT line but +12 on 2pt FGs
Total: GT 40-for-131 (.305); Opponents 49-for-157 (.312)
Here's where it gets bad...
@ BC (L) GT 5-for-14, BC 11-for-23 (net -18)
@ Louisville (L) GT 7-for-13, UL 12-for-20 (net -15)
Duke (L) GT 7-for-27, Duke 7-for-16 (net 0) GT was -8 on 2s and -3 from FT line
@ WF (L) GT 1-for-9, WF 9-for-17 (net -24)
Total: GT 20-for-63 (.317); Opponents 39-for-76 (.513)
OVERALL IN ACC PLAY
GT 60-for-194 (.309); Opponents 88-for-233 (.378)
GT has been outscored by 84 on 3pt FGs in ACC play.
The first 9 ACC games actually weren't as bad as I thought...
@ ND (L) GT 6-for-20, ND 7-for-20 (net -3) We went 7-for-18 from the FT line, were -8 there
vs. Miami (W) GT 1-for-10, Miami 4-for-19 (net -9) GT +9 from FT line
vs. ND (W) GT 5-for-12, ND 4-for-18 (net +3) GT -2 from FT line
@ Pitt (W) GT 3-for-15, Pitt 6-for-14 (net -9) FTs were a wash, GT was +24 on 2pt FGs
vs. UVa (L) GT 5-for-11, UVa 3-for-13 (net +6), GT was -24 on 2pt FGs
@ UNC (L) GT 5-for-18, UNC 5-for-21 (net 0), GT was -16 on FTs
@ FSU (L) GT 5-for-16, FSU 5-for-13 (net 0), GT was -16 on 2pt FGs
vs. Clemson (L) GT 5-for-11, Clemson 10-for-21 (net -15)
vs. Cuse (W) Both teams 5-for-18, GT was -8 at FT line but +12 on 2pt FGs
Total: GT 40-for-131 (.305); Opponents 49-for-157 (.312)
Here's where it gets bad...
@ BC (L) GT 5-for-14, BC 11-for-23 (net -18)
@ Louisville (L) GT 7-for-13, UL 12-for-20 (net -15)
Duke (L) GT 7-for-27, Duke 7-for-16 (net 0) GT was -8 on 2s and -3 from FT line
@ WF (L) GT 1-for-9, WF 9-for-17 (net -24)
Total: GT 20-for-63 (.317); Opponents 39-for-76 (.513)
OVERALL IN ACC PLAY
GT 60-for-194 (.309); Opponents 88-for-233 (.378)
GT has been outscored by 84 on 3pt FGs in ACC play.
