This Should drop them to number 12 in the polls.Good Buddha do they suck. But you watch, they will cover.
This Should drop them to number 12 in the polls.Good Buddha do they suck. But you watch, they will cover.
Damn I hate to see unc win. Not that I like Pitt but I hate unc.UNC just scored with 2 seconds left to tie Pitt. XP will win it, 37-36. High scoring as expected.
Pitt going to run. unc and Miami are going to pass more than anyone we will see this year. Hope we can get to the QB better than we have the last 4 games. A couple of long drives by Tech and 2 stops by the D would be nice.It just reinforced what I've been observing and thinking all along. One, our offense should be able to move the ball against both Pitt and especially the Cheaters. Two, our defense hasn't seen the best offense yet if anybody thinks Clemson is it. In fact, Miami may be better. But, I believe our D will have its hands more full with Pitt and the Cheaters than we did two nights ago.
Of course, we may catch a break and miss the ACC's best offense if they turn out that way in Louisville. We'll get a better feel for that a week from tonight at Death Valley.
ACC FB is improving and looking pretty strong, IMO. The SEC is down versus previous years.
I guess they didn't wake up today. But I thought uga 1st offense looked good against Ole Miss 3 rd Defense which was a lot of walk-on's
Guess I'm a Tenn fan next week.Hopefully, next Saturday at the Toilet Bowl, the Vols won't wait to start playing until the 2nd half like they did today.
Bummer. Army blows a 20-6 4Q lead and loses in OT at Buffalo, 23-20, on a Bulls FG.
Believe my picks are just luck. I made my pick and then went with the other team.stech81, your strategy worked.
Congrats to stech81 (7-3) and Texwood (6-4) who were the only 2 pickers with winning records this week. Yours truly pulled in a season's worst week at 2-8.
This week's "performance" follows a week where everybody went 5-5 or better. This reinforces how difficult this is...particularly when having to pick set games that most you likely would never actually wager on. It also reinforces why whenever you hear someone bragging about picking 75+% winners over the long-term, you know they are full of crap. I've been doing this going on almost 30 years now. I've had some good years and some not so good years. And again, on games *I* choose to play. (had a good day yesterday...hooray!) But, nobody hits 75+% and even the sharps are doing well to hit in the 60% range over time.
why can't Notre Dame give this effort when GT has them on the schedule?Holy hell, Duke has put 28 on the board in the first half at Notre Dame. VanGorder might need a police escort to get out of there if they somehow lose to Duke.
stech81, your strategy worked.
Congrats to stech81 (7-3) and Texwood (6-4) who were the only 2 pickers with winning records this week. Yours truly pulled in a season's worst week at 2-8.
This week's "performance" follows a week where everybody went 5-5 or better. This reinforces how difficult this is...particularly when having to pick set games that most you likely would never actually wager on. It also reinforces why whenever you hear someone bragging about picking 75+% winners over the long-term, you know they are full of crap. I've been doing this going on almost 30 years now. I've had some good years and some not so good years. And again, on games *I* choose to play. (had a good day yesterday...hooray!) But, nobody hits 75+% and even the sharps are doing well to hit in the 60% range over time.