I’m still scratching my head trying to understand how in one week or less an interim coach takes the same players, same coaching staff, etc. on the road to Pittsburgh and pulls off an upset. Granted Collins was a clown show and Pittsburg was not the 1985 Chicago Bears. And subsequent games we did not show well, but we all know Collins would not have beaten Pitt on the road. Was it the players did not believe in Collins? Did Key change schematics and approach to game planning and management? I’m very bullish on Coach Key, but it is hard for me to understand what changed in one week to make a difference?
I’d be interested in others insight and opinions.
I’d be interested in others insight and opinions.